{"id":81144,"date":"2022-08-01T20:10:08","date_gmt":"2022-08-01T17:10:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/?p=81144"},"modified":"2023-03-21T11:46:24","modified_gmt":"2023-03-21T09:46:24","slug":"stamka","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/script_transfer_new.mowfns.ap-southeast-2.wpstaqhosting.com\/en\/stamka\/","title":{"rendered":"Stamka v. Minister of the Interior"},"content":{"rendered":"<p dir=\"ltr\">As part of our office&#8217;s project of summarizing and explicating key Israeli Supreme Court decisions, this article summarizes Stamka v. the Minister of Interior, an HCJ case which determined that<\/p>\n<h4 dir=\"ltr\"><u>Facts<\/u><\/h4>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">Petitioners, who are intermarried, challenged the Ministry of the Interior\u2019s 1995 interpretation of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.adalah.org\/uploads\/oldfiles\/Public\/files\/Discriminatory-Laws-Database\/English\/36-Law-of-Return-1950.pdf\">Law of Return<\/a>. They also challenged the Ministry of the Interior\u2019s policy requiring a non-Jewish spouse to leave the country until <a href=\"https:\/\/script_transfer_new.mowfns.ap-southeast-2.wpstaqhosting.com\/en\/status-in-israel-for-spouses\/\">the Ministry of the Interior had completed its examination of the marriage\u2019s authenticity<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-61187 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/script_transfer_new.mowfns.ap-southeast-2.wpstaqhosting.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/closeup-gavel-judgement-concept-300x212.jpg\" alt=\"Stamka v. Minister of the Interior\" width=\"300\" height=\"212\" srcset=\"https:\/\/script_transfer_new.mowfns.ap-southeast-2.wpstaqhosting.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/closeup-gavel-judgement-concept-300x212.jpg 300w, https:\/\/script_transfer_new.mowfns.ap-southeast-2.wpstaqhosting.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/closeup-gavel-judgement-concept-1024x724.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/script_transfer_new.mowfns.ap-southeast-2.wpstaqhosting.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/closeup-gavel-judgement-concept-768x543.jpg 768w, https:\/\/script_transfer_new.mowfns.ap-southeast-2.wpstaqhosting.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/closeup-gavel-judgement-concept.jpg 1280w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/p>\n<h4 dir=\"ltr\"><u>Issue One<\/u><\/h4>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">Is a non-Jewish partner entitled to the rights granted by the Law of Return and the Nationality Law to a Jew who immigrates to Israel? Is that partner entitled to Israeli citizenship as if she were a Jew who immigrated to Israel?<\/p>\n<h4 dir=\"ltr\"><u>Rules<\/u><\/h4>\n<ul dir=\"ltr\">\n<li>When one of the two heads of the household is Jewish, both heads of household, and their children and grandchildren, whether they immigrate together or separately, are entitled to come to Israel by virtue of the Law of Return, and obtain automatic citizenship.<\/li>\n<li>The right of return is granted only to the family members of Jews prior to their immigration to Israel.<\/li>\n<li>A non-citizen who marries an Israeli citizen does not acquire a right to naturalization solely because of the marriage.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h4 dir=\"ltr\"><u>Analysis<\/u><\/h4>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">Under section 4A of the Law of Return, \u201cthe rights of a Jew\u2026and the rights of an oleh under the Nationality Law\u2026are also vested in\u2026the spouse of a Jew.\u201d While sec. 4A expands to include the spouse of a Jew, a non-Jew who becomes a spouse of a Jew who is already an Israeli citizen at the time of marriage is not entitled to the rights granted by the Law of Return and the Nationality Law.<\/p>\n<h4 dir=\"ltr\"><u>Conclusion<\/u><\/h4>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">When one spouse is Jewish, that couple, as well as their children and grandchildren, may immigrate to Israel under the Law of Return.<\/p>\n<h4 dir=\"ltr\"><u>Issue Two<\/u><\/h4>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">In most of the petitions in this case, a non-Jewish, foreign partner has been asked to leave the country until the Ministry of the Interior can <a href=\"https:\/\/script_transfer_new.mowfns.ap-southeast-2.wpstaqhosting.com\/en\/relationship-sincerity-interview\/\">investigate the marriage<\/a> to ascertain whether it is bona fide or fictitious. Is that policy justified, and should the Ministry of the Interior be permitted to continue to act in accordance with that policy?<\/p>\n<h4 dir=\"ltr\"><u>Rules<\/u><\/h4>\n<ul dir=\"ltr\">\n<li>For the Minister\u2019s policy to prevail, it must satisfy the proportionality requirement, consisting of three components: (1) the rational connection component; (2) the least harmful means component; and (3) the harm\/benefit component.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h4 dir=\"ltr\"><u>Analysis<\/u><\/h4>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">The following three elements of the proportionality requirement must be met in order for the Minister\u2019s policy to be enforceable.<\/p>\n<h4 dir=\"ltr\"><em>The Rational Connection Component<\/em><\/h4>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">This component requires a rational connection between the means chosen by the authority and the objective it seeks to achieve. The connection between the means and the objective is insufficient for several reasons:<\/p>\n<ol dir=\"ltr\">\n<li>A non-citizen who seeks to extend his presence in Israel by means of fictitious marriage will not likely be deterred by a waiting period of several months abroad.<\/li>\n<li>The Ministry of the Interior did not present any data showing that the policy reduces fictitious marriages.<\/li>\n<li>Removing one or both spouses from the country may make it more difficult to conduct the examinations required to determine the authenticity of the couple\u2019s relationship.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h4 dir=\"ltr\"><em>The Least Harmful Means Component<\/em><\/h4>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">This component requires that the least harmful means be employed. Here, the policy is overly harmful because of the emotional difficulty that occurs during separation. Separation can also increase a couple\u2019s financial burdens.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-56381 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/script_transfer_new.mowfns.ap-southeast-2.wpstaqhosting.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/court-hammer-books-judgment-law-concept-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"stamka\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" srcset=\"https:\/\/script_transfer_new.mowfns.ap-southeast-2.wpstaqhosting.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/court-hammer-books-judgment-law-concept-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/script_transfer_new.mowfns.ap-southeast-2.wpstaqhosting.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/court-hammer-books-judgment-law-concept-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/script_transfer_new.mowfns.ap-southeast-2.wpstaqhosting.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/court-hammer-books-judgment-law-concept-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/script_transfer_new.mowfns.ap-southeast-2.wpstaqhosting.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/court-hammer-books-judgment-law-concept-1536x1024.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/script_transfer_new.mowfns.ap-southeast-2.wpstaqhosting.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/03\/court-hammer-books-judgment-law-concept-2048x1365.jpg 2048w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/p>\n<h4 dir=\"ltr\"><em>The Harm\/Benefit Component<\/em><\/h4>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">This component requires that the benefits to the policy outweigh any harm caused by the policy. The benefit derived from the policy is not greater than the harm it inflicts because the benefit the policy achieves is speculative and not backed up by evidence, whereas the harm to bona fide marriages is proven.<\/p>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">Exceptions to the proportionality requirement include clear evidence of a fictitious marriage or obvious forgery of a marriage certificate.<\/p>\n<h4 dir=\"ltr\"><u>Conclusion<\/u><\/h4>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">The Ministry of the Interior\u2019s policy regarding non-citizens married to Israelis while residing in Israel without a permit does not meet the proportionality test and is unlawful and void. Instead, a non-citizen in this circumstance will be required to meet a higher standard of proof in order to prove the legitimacy of the marriage.<\/p>\n<h4 dir=\"ltr\"><u>Issue Three<\/u><\/h4>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">Assuming a non-Jew is not entitled to the rights granted a Jew under the Law of Return, what is her status under the Nationality Law? Does she enjoy preferred rights under this law, or is she the same as any immigrant?<\/p>\n<h4 dir=\"ltr\"><u>Rules<\/u><\/h4>\n<ul dir=\"ltr\">\n<li>The right of a spouse to citizenship takes precedence over the right of others; however, a non-citizen partner is not entitled to an immediate right of permanent residency and citizenship.<\/li>\n<li>The Minister of the Interior holds the authority to grant or deny an application for naturalization. Under Section 7 of the Nationality Law, the Minister of the Interior is directed to show leniency to spouses of citizens in the naturalization process.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h4 dir=\"ltr\"><u>Analysis<\/u><\/h4>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">Section 7 of the Nationality Law authorizes the Minister of the Interior to grant citizenship to the spouse of an Israeli citizen even if that spouse does not meet the general criteria for citizenship detailed in sec. 5(a) of that law. The Minister holds broad discretion in this regard, but he may not ignore the provision of sec. 7 permitting leniency for the spouses of Israeli citizens requesting Israeli citizenship. The burden is on the Minister to explain why he does not exempt such a spouse from the criteria under sec. 5(a).<\/p>\n<h4 dir=\"ltr\"><u>Conclusion<\/u><\/h4>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">The Minister\u2019s policy is inconsistent with the legislature\u2019s directive under sec. 7 of the Nationality Law to show leniency to spouses of citizens in the naturalization process. The Minister must establish and publish a policy by which the spouse of a citizen will be granted citizenship at the conclusion of a reasonable period of time and upon meeting the prerequisite criteria.<\/p>\n<h4 dir=\"ltr\"><u>Issue Four<\/u><\/h4>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">Is the Ministry of the Interior justified in refusing the petitioners\u2019 request to have their marital status registered in the Population Registry?<\/p>\n<h4 dir=\"ltr\"><u>Conclusion<\/u><\/h4>\n<p dir=\"ltr\">The Court remanded this matter to the Minister of the Interior to carry out his examination, stating that the doors of the court would remain open.<\/p>\n<p>[author_and_contact_info]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As part of our office&#8217;s project of summarizing and explicating key Israeli Supreme Court decisions, this article summarizes Stamka v. the Minister of Interior, an HCJ case which determined that Facts Petitioners, who are intermarried, challenged the Ministry of the Interior\u2019s 1995 interpretation of the Law of Return. They also challenged the Ministry of the&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":22,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[627,666],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-81144","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-judgment-summaries","category-status-in-israel-for-foreign-spouses"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v22.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Stamka v. Minister of the Interior<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Stamka v. Minister of the Interior determined the rights of non-Jewish spouses of Jews to receive status in Israel\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"noindex, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"\u05de\u05d9\u05db\u05d0\u05dc \u05d3\u05e7\u05e8\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 \u05d3\u05e7\u05d5\u05ea\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/en\/stamka\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/en\/stamka\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Michael Decker\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/#\/schema\/person\/a7e273ea2b17723a1141b76c46f2dfeb\"},\"headline\":\"Stamka v. Minister of the Interior\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-08-01T17:10:08+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-03-21T09:46:24+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/en\/stamka\/\"},\"wordCount\":1036,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Judgment Summaries\",\"Status in Israel for Foreign Spouses\"],\"inLanguage\":\"he-IL\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/en\/stamka\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/en\/stamka\/\",\"name\":\"Stamka v. Minister of the Interior\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2022-08-01T17:10:08+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-03-21T09:46:24+00:00\",\"description\":\"Stamka v. Minister of the Interior determined the rights of non-Jewish spouses of Jews to receive status in Israel\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/en\/stamka\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"he-IL\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/en\/stamka\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/en\/stamka\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Stamka v. Minister of the Interior\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/\",\"name\":\"\u05d3\u05e7\u05e8, \u05e4\u05e7\u05e1, \u05dc\u05d5\u05d9\",\"description\":\"\u05de\u05e9\u05e8\u05d3 \u05e2\u05d5&quot;\u05d3 \u05d3\u05e7\u05e8, \u05e4\u05e7\u05e1, \u05dc\u05d5\u05d9\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"he-IL\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Decker, Pex, Levi, Rosenberg\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"he-IL\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/script_transfer_new.mowfns.ap-southeast-2.wpstaqhosting.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/logo-DPORL-png.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/script_transfer_new.mowfns.ap-southeast-2.wpstaqhosting.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/logo-DPORL-png.png\",\"width\":623,\"height\":217,\"caption\":\"Decker, Pex, Levi, Rosenberg\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CohenDeckerPexBroshLawOffice\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/17964447\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCl4bpApJMC9KIBF-TCN2gcA\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/#\/schema\/person\/a7e273ea2b17723a1141b76c46f2dfeb\",\"name\":\"Michael Decker\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"he-IL\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/script_transfer_new.mowfns.ap-southeast-2.wpstaqhosting.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MIKE-150x150.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/script_transfer_new.mowfns.ap-southeast-2.wpstaqhosting.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MIKE-150x150.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Michael Decker\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/script_transfer_new.mowfns.ap-southeast-2.wpstaqhosting.com\/author\/micael\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Stamka v. Minister of the Interior","description":"Stamka v. Minister of the Interior determined the rights of non-Jewish spouses of Jews to receive status in Israel","robots":{"index":"noindex","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"twitter_misc":{"Written by":"\u05de\u05d9\u05db\u05d0\u05dc \u05d3\u05e7\u05e8","Est. reading time":"5 \u05d3\u05e7\u05d5\u05ea"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/en\/stamka\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/en\/stamka\/"},"author":{"name":"Michael Decker","@id":"https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/#\/schema\/person\/a7e273ea2b17723a1141b76c46f2dfeb"},"headline":"Stamka v. Minister of the Interior","datePublished":"2022-08-01T17:10:08+00:00","dateModified":"2023-03-21T09:46:24+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/en\/stamka\/"},"wordCount":1036,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Judgment Summaries","Status in Israel for Foreign Spouses"],"inLanguage":"he-IL"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/en\/stamka\/","url":"https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/en\/stamka\/","name":"Stamka v. Minister of the Interior","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/#website"},"datePublished":"2022-08-01T17:10:08+00:00","dateModified":"2023-03-21T09:46:24+00:00","description":"Stamka v. Minister of the Interior determined the rights of non-Jewish spouses of Jews to receive status in Israel","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/en\/stamka\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"he-IL","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/en\/stamka\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/en\/stamka\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Stamka v. Minister of the Interior"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/#website","url":"https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/","name":"\u05d3\u05e7\u05e8, \u05e4\u05e7\u05e1, \u05dc\u05d5\u05d9","description":"\u05de\u05e9\u05e8\u05d3 \u05e2\u05d5&quot;\u05d3 \u05d3\u05e7\u05e8, \u05e4\u05e7\u05e1, \u05dc\u05d5\u05d9","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"he-IL"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/#organization","name":"Decker, Pex, Levi, Rosenberg","url":"https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"he-IL","@id":"https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/script_transfer_new.mowfns.ap-southeast-2.wpstaqhosting.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/logo-DPORL-png.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/script_transfer_new.mowfns.ap-southeast-2.wpstaqhosting.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/logo-DPORL-png.png","width":623,"height":217,"caption":"Decker, Pex, Levi, Rosenberg"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/CohenDeckerPexBroshLawOffice","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/17964447","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCl4bpApJMC9KIBF-TCN2gcA"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/#\/schema\/person\/a7e273ea2b17723a1141b76c46f2dfeb","name":"Michael Decker","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"he-IL","@id":"https:\/\/lawoffice.org.il\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/script_transfer_new.mowfns.ap-southeast-2.wpstaqhosting.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MIKE-150x150.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/script_transfer_new.mowfns.ap-southeast-2.wpstaqhosting.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/MIKE-150x150.jpg","caption":"Michael Decker"},"url":"https:\/\/script_transfer_new.mowfns.ap-southeast-2.wpstaqhosting.com\/author\/micael\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/script_transfer_new.mowfns.ap-southeast-2.wpstaqhosting.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/81144","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/script_transfer_new.mowfns.ap-southeast-2.wpstaqhosting.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/script_transfer_new.mowfns.ap-southeast-2.wpstaqhosting.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/script_transfer_new.mowfns.ap-southeast-2.wpstaqhosting.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/22"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/script_transfer_new.mowfns.ap-southeast-2.wpstaqhosting.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=81144"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/script_transfer_new.mowfns.ap-southeast-2.wpstaqhosting.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/81144\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":98430,"href":"https:\/\/script_transfer_new.mowfns.ap-southeast-2.wpstaqhosting.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/81144\/revisions\/98430"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/script_transfer_new.mowfns.ap-southeast-2.wpstaqhosting.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=81144"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/script_transfer_new.mowfns.ap-southeast-2.wpstaqhosting.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=81144"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/script_transfer_new.mowfns.ap-southeast-2.wpstaqhosting.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=81144"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}